In my case, I absolutely loved the first piece - I thought it hit everything just right. I think because the first part felt like a finished story, I didn't think the other parts were necessary - not that they're bad stories, or poorly written, or anything like that. Just didn't have the impact that the first one did, because I thought the first one was all the verse that was needed.
Does that make sense?
(If it helps, my decision to have the Ben/Dean scenes end after scene twelve was based on the same reasoning - there's no more story to be told in this same way, in this same verse. Maybe at some point I'll write Ben and Dean, thirty years later, but it doesn't belong with the rest of the scenes.)
no subject
Does that make sense?
(If it helps, my decision to have the Ben/Dean scenes end after scene twelve was based on the same reasoning - there's no more story to be told in this same way, in this same verse. Maybe at some point I'll write Ben and Dean, thirty years later, but it doesn't belong with the rest of the scenes.)